Administrators’ top three concerns all focused on student compliance, surpassing fears related to funding cost or time to prepare. Nearly three-quarters (72 percent) of respondents said their greatest concern is getting students to follow social distancing guidelines in residence halls and in other on-campus housing. While almost all institutions (93 percent) planned to use floor markings and signs to help students stay six feet apart, ensuring student compliance in on-campus common areas ranks as administrators’ second-biggest concern (57 percent). The third most common concern (52 percent) was the extent to which students would follow safety measures while off campus.
“Enforcing social distancing in classrooms, libraries, and other public spaces won’t be easy, but schools know they will have little to no control over whether students adhere to safety guidelines when they go off campus or in private spaces in residence halls,” said EAB Managing Director Dr. Liz Rothenberg.
A majority of respondents reported medium to high confidence in their ability to educate and promote social distancing among staff, faculty, and graduate students. In comparison, less than one-third (31 percent) expressed high confidence in their ability to promote social distancing among undergraduate students.
To increase awareness and educate students, most institutions intend to use positive reinforcement strategies, including depicting positive behaviors on social media (79 percent) and using student leaders and campus influencers to promote social distancing (75 percent). Furthermore, about two-thirds (67 percent) of respondents said they are planning to provide students with welcome kits that include safety materials such as face masks and educational information about physical-distancing protocols.
There is little consensus on what punitive measures schools will use to enforce new policies when students fail to comply. Some schools are not considering sanctions at all, while others are considering referring students for additional education and coaching and even banning students from campus for two weeks for repeated noncompliance. When it comes to carrying out these proposed penalties, the top concern was to ensure they are enforced equitably (52 percent).
“Preventing intentional and unintentional biases is top of mind for every institutional leader, including when it comes to making sure these new COVID-19 policies and procedures are enforced equally and fairly and that they won’t disproportionately affect students who are already facing greater challenges,” Rothenberg added.
Responses were collected in early June from senior student affairs leaders, including vice presidents of student affairs, deans of students, and chiefs of staff. Detailed survey insights can be found in a new post on EAB’s website, “What will social distancing look like for students at colleges and universities this fall?”
At EAB, our mission is to make education smarter and our communities stronger. We harness the collective power of more than 1,700 schools, colleges, and universities to uncover and apply proven practices and transformative insights. And since complex problems require multifaceted solutions, we work with each school differently to apply these insights through a customized blend of research, technology, and services. From kindergarten to college and beyond, EAB partners with education leaders, practitioners, and staffs to accelerate progress and drive results across three key areas: enrollment management, student success, and institutional operations and strategy.
John Michaels EAB 202-747-1788 email@example.com