“Their conviction on these two counts makes no sense in that context.”
However, prosecutor Jeremy McWilliams defended the guilty findings as “entirely rational and entirely logical”.
Mr McWilliams said the jury was active and took its task seriously, asking thoughtful questions to clarify evidence and their task during the trial.
“[It’s] not a jury that has betrayed its oath, but one that has performed their task entirely consistent with it,” he said.
“It’s not a conclusion he’s a liar. It’s not a conclusion he’s a fantasist,” he said.
Woods was cleared of one charge of sexual penetration of a child aged 10 to 16, five charges of gross indecency and six of indecent assault.
The County Court was told Woods was 24 when she thought she had fallen in love with a 14-year-old boy left in her care.
The relationship started out like mother and son, but evolved to a point where Woods thought of the child as a “boyfriend”.
Woods had previously been the boy’s teacher before privately tutoring him, and then caring for him when his parents were away.
The pair exchanged countless love letters during 1984, but Woods insisted the pair should “not step over the line”.
But in August that year, Woods “exceeded the boundaries”, molesting the teenager.
She was arrested in 2017 after the victim had a “breakdown” and told his father what happened.
She was sentenced in December but avoided jail, instead receiving a two-year community corrections order with 200 hours of community work.
The appeal judges have reserved their decision.